Back

 

Shaftsbury Solid Waste Committee

January 3, 2006, 7:30 p.m., Cole Hall



Present: Bill Pennebaker (Chair), Michael Biddy, Karen Mellinger, 
Forrest Snyder
Absent: Trevor Mance and Christie Coleman

Bill called the meeting to order at 7:55 p.m.

The minutes of December 6, 2005 were distributed.

Karen is ill and could only attend momentarily. Forrest volunteered 
to take minutes for this meeting.

Before leaving, Karen reported that the Select Board had given the 
SWC the charge of determining the details of implementing a PAYT 
system. She also noted that for the last two years, Shaftsbury's 
solid waste volume has increased 13% each year and that recycling has 
DECLINED.

A general discussion of how a PAYT system might work in Shaftsbury 
took place. From previous research, Bill thought that 1500 - 1800 
bags a week would be needed. As a starting point, 20% of those will 
be assumed to be 13 gallon bags and the remainder, 30 or 33 gallon 
bags. Forrest volunteered to research bag suppliers, bag types 
(virgin or recycled plastics), bag thickness, package sizes, case 
storage requirements, and printing. Michael pointed out that bags 
would be considered currency and required a secure storage facility. 
Bill said he'd work on a more accurate PAYT system cost/budget, given 
end-user costs of $1.50 per 30 gallon bag and $1.00 per 13 gallon 
bag. Michael volunteered to speak with local businesses that might be 
interested in carrying the PAYT bags.

Forrest and Bill shared three articles about Single Stream recycling 
with Michael. One early conclusion seems to be that broken glass 
contaminates the sorting of single stream recycling. Thus, if it was 
pursued, it might make sense to have a "Dual Stream" system where 
glass went into one container and all other types of recycling went 
into another. Bill noted that Casella's does do Single Stream 
recycling for their commercial customers at the Sunderland Transfer 
Station. The Committee discussed taking a site visit to the Single 
Stream sorting facility in Rutland.

The closure of the Shaftsbury landfill continues to be a topic of 
discussion at Select Board meetings. Bill reported that he'd been 
following up with the latest survey's and information from the Select 
Board with members of the State Solid Waste Division. The site survey 
has been completed and the grades now rendered on the plan meet 
specifications for slopes. Bill is satisfied with the "cap matching" 
the existing covered refuse. A bid spec using a geo-synthetic membrane 
is being developed. Bill has been reviewing documentation on 
geo-synthetic membranes and thinks they can be "pretty good" IF they 
are installed and monitored correctly. The big problem, he noted, is 
water. Water allows either the membrane or the surrounding soils to 
move, causing tears and failure. The key to preventing this type of 
failure is good drains and drain maintenance. The  system has to be 
designed to withstand the worst case scenario, the "100 year rain." 
Notably, the bid spec drawing and plans from the Town's consulting 
engineers (KASS) only made one minor mention of drains. Bill has made 
this bid spec oversight known to Aaron Chrostowsky.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:59 p.m.

Respectfully submitted by Forrest Snyder

 

 Back